← Search

Emily Schaeff-accetta

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 3W–23L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emily Schaeff-accetta to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-09-02 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-23 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · LTC-M NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · LTC-M NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · LTC-M NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelique Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · LTC-M NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Salzberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · LTC-M BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-21 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-14 · LTC-M BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Eddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · LTC-M BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · LTC-M BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelique Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
11.5%
3W–23L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#1 Singles
15%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe