← Search

Elizabeth Kuhlo

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 13W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Kuhlo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missey Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Glasgow/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zorana George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Mihalko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · Savage/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Missey Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-18 · Musick/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wendi Mihalko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Savage/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Mihalko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Savage/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Mihalko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · Mihalko/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Sneed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · Savage/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · Sheahan/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missey Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 47.2% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 40% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer