← Search

Elise Wirkus

Washington, DC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 15W–11L · seasons 2023–2025

Captains: add Elise Wirkus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2025-12-07 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steve Routh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
Jennifer Ko / Mike Hill Jr
2025-10-26 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Holubecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-27 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steve Routh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-14 · Cedar Sprintinas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirah Yen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-4
L
2025-09-13 · Cedar Sprintinas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirah Yen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-1
W
2025-08-02 · Cedar Sprintinas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natilee Festa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2
W
2025-06-01 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-05-28 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomoko Itoga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-1
W
2025-05-17 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Blitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-4
W
2025-04-13 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Binecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-04-12 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-03-22 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Maddocks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 49.7% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.1% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams