← Search

Anna Siddall

Cedar Rapids, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 6W–7L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anna Siddall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maleah Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Ann Brown / Amara Andrews
2026-06-02 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maleah Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Skogman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-28 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-11-23 · Garner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Trovas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-24 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Whitham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-26 · Brown: Elmcrest · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-07-23 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-18 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Kemmerer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-06-11 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Kemmerer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 23% of the time
#1 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#1 Singles
15%
2 matches
#2 Singles
15%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe