← Search

Frances Friedland

Boulder, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 35W–16L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Frances Friedland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2025-08-28 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-08-07 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-08-01 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Julie Benson / Claire Schlosser
2025-07-17 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Starry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Catherine Jankowski / Katie Brown
2025-07-03 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-06-12 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Heather
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-10 · BCC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalia Harms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-06-05 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-05-27 · BCC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-22 · BCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-05-20 · BCC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalia Harms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-05-15 · BCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Dolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.8% of games
3.5
71.4%
30W–12L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer