← Search

Gabriella Yarbrough

Cordova, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 42W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Gabriella Yarbrough to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Felicia Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Ansel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Vaughn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Darnell Wormely / Dee Bias
2026-07-11 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Ross/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Amaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Ross/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Hervey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Ross/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Amaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Andrea Henry / Jennifer Wright
2026-03-29 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-22 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-11-12 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Rodriguez Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.7% of games
4.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 56.8% of games
4.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 41.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.6% of games
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#1 Singles
20%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer