← Search

Megan Etheridge

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 147W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Megan Etheridge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
W
2026-07-14 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-04 · LIB-Haessler LOW TRI DAY Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sauld
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-1
L
2026-02-11 · LIB-Haessler LOW TRI DAY Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Mooney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dee Lamphear
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dee Lamphear
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Sandison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-08-25 · 2LIB-LEVASSEUR WOMEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-08-06 · 2LIB-LEVASSEUR WOMEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Carlson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
N/A
2025-08-05 · 2CHIP-SLADE 80MIX 18&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hunter St Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 66.7% of games
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 75.8% of games
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.7% of games
3.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 65.1% of games
4.0
55%
33W–27L · 53.5% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
10W–0L · 74.5% of games
7.5
40%
6W–9L · 53.3% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 67.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal