← Search

Noah Yao

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 46W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Noah Yao to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-07-17 · TOC.Yao · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Reynders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-5
W
2025-10-05 · TOC.Gregson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nick Gilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
Scott Hoffman
2025-09-16 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Adam Whitesell
2025-09-09 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Dat Pham / Scott Hudson
2025-08-23 · TOC.Gregson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Jack Drechsler
2025-08-12 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2025-07-26 · TOC.Yao · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura McNiven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-13 · MGregson-ENO · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Nealis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-26 · TOC.Yao · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Pack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
John Lin / Kevin Brown
2025-06-08 · MGregson-ENO · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Nealis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · with Vaibhav Parmar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-11 · Mi.Ratliff18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fitzsimmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 48.3% of games
4.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.6% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 47.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe