← Search

MacKenzie Fowler

— year-end
45 matches · 22W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add MacKenzie Fowler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-06-15 · Johnson-NC 3.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Narendra Ravinootala mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Missie Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · Bowling - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Ohrberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · Johnson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashleigh Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-07 · Bowling - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Angela Brown / Bronia Jenkins
2026-03-29 · Moore/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Missie Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Johnson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-18 · Bowling - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jami Feinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-14 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Missie Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Burford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Johnson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristi Cherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Teams18 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.9% of games
3.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 47.5% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.5% of games
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.2% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal