← Search

Hallie Biggs

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 31W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Hallie Biggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2025-11-11 · Mihalko/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Jamie Harris / Micaela Cignetti
2025-11-05 · Mihalko/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-10-29 · Mihalko/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsey Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · Belvin/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Kelly Irvine / Lacey Craig
2025-10-22 · Mihalko/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsey Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-10-21 · Mihalko/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-10-19 · Belvin/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-25 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with E'Lane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-08-28 · Washburn/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with E'Lane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-26 · Ramsey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shanleigh Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-29 · Hammons/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsey Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
Anita Kang / Michele Smith
2025-06-24 · Hammons/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Mihalko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
12W–0L · 68.9% of games
3.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 49.8% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 28% of the time
#2 Singles
28%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova